ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and validation of a prognosis prediction model based on 18 endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of SMARCA4 in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- The role of B cell immunity in lung adenocarcinoma.Genes and immunity · 2025Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics and machine learning unveil ferroptosis features in tumor-associated macrophages: Prognostic model and therapeutic strategies for lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Deciphering the prognostic role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in lung adenocarcinoma: integrating prognostic prediction and immunotherapy strategies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- The endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes and molecular typing predicts prognosis and reveals characterization of tumor immune microenvironment in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Integrated multi-omic analysis and experiment reveals the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress had a crucial impact on cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis in various cancers. However, the role of ER stress in lung adenocarcinoma remains unclear. Method: Gene expression and clinical data of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and three Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. ER stress score (ERSS) was constructed based on hub genes selected from 799 ER stress-related genes by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. A Cox regression model, integrating ERSS and the TNM stage, was developed to predict overall survival (OS) in TCGA cohort and was validated in GEO cohorts. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), and gene mutation analyses were performed to further understand the molecular features of ERSS. The tumor immune infiltration was evaluated by ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and xCell algorithms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive value of the risk model. Results: One hundred fifty-seven differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between tumor and para-carcinoma tissues, and 45 of them significantly correlated with OS. Next, we identified 18 hub genes and constructed ERSS by LASSO regression. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher ERSS ( Conclusion: We developed and validated an ER stress-related risk model that exhibited great predictive value for OS in patients with LUAD. Our work also expanded the understanding of the role of ER stress in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.