Evidence mapPaperPMID 36118698Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Gender-specific prevalence and risk factors of mild cognitive impairment among older adults in Chongming, Shanghai, China.

Yuewen Liu, Xing Yu, Peipei Han, Xiaoyu Chen, Feng Wang, Xuan Lian, Jiayu Li, Ruijin Li, Beibei Wang, Chunliu Xu and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between circadian rhythm disturbances and cognitive decline in the elderly: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and Safety ofNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical Effectiveness of Treatments for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Adults: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuewen LiuShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xing YuShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Peipei HanShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyu ChenShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Feng WangShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xuan LianShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiayu LiShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ruijin LiShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Beibei WangShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunliu XuShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junxue LiShanghai Health Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yaqing ZhengFujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ziwei ZhangFujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ming LiShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ying YuShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qi GuoShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the gender differences in the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the correlation between multiple influencing factors. Materials and methods: The sample was comprised of 1325 relatively healthy participants aged ≥ 60 years in a Shanghai community-dwelling (557 males and 768 females). Cognitive function was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale was used to assess the activities of daily living. Results: The overall prevalence of MCI was 15.2%, with 10.2% in men and 18.9% in women. In older male subjects, those with higher the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores [odds ratio (OR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.14] and hypertension (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.15-4.73) had a higher risk of MCI. female subjects who were illiterate (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.82-4.78), had a farming background (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.05-2.72), and a history of stroke (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.07-3.59) had a higher risk of MCI, but this was not true for males. However, Male subjects who never smoked were less likely to have MCI (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.09-0.54). Additionally, the prevalence of MCI was lower in older women with high grip strength (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92-0.99) and hyperlipidemia (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22-0.96). Conclusion: The prevalence of MCI was higher in the population of elderly women compared to men. Moreover, it was found that members with MCI tended to having higher GDS scores, smoking, and hypertension; whereas a history of farming, illiteracy, stroke, grip strength, and hyperlipidemia were correlated with MCI in women.

Indexed as

gender differencesmild cognitive impairmentolder adultsprevalencerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36118698
PMCPMC9475287
OpenAlexW4294308084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.