SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Incidence of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma after isolated STIC diagnosis: A systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intergroup statement: opportunistic salpingectomy-molecular pathology, clinical outcomes and implications for practice (German Ovarian Cancer Commission, the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NOGGO), AGO Austria and AGO Swiss).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Guideline
- Tubal epithelial alterations: evolving concepts.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Supporting Histopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Gynecological Cancers: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- First Analysis of the Incidence of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma (STIC) in Germany - Evaluation of the Cancer Registry of the Federal State of Rhineland-Palatinate from 2016 to 2023.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- The challenge of managing isolated STIC lesions: A single-center experience.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma-looking into the earliest events of ovarian cancer development.Academia oncology · 2025Article
- Incidence of peritoneal cancer after oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- A questionnaire-based survey on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for patients with STIC in Germany.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Molecular Histopathology for Establishing Diagnostic Method and Clinical Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Information on treatment and outcome of isolated STIC is rare. Therefore, we reviewed systematically the published literature to determine the incidence of subsequent HGSC in the high- and low-risk population and to summarize the current diagnostic and therapeutic options. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE-Ovid, Cochrane Library and Web of Science of articles published from February 2006 to July 2021. Patients with an isolated STIC diagnosis and clinical follow-up were included. Study exclusion criteria for review were the presence of synchronous gynaecological cancer and/or concurrent non-gynaecological malignancies. Results: 3031 abstracts were screened. 112 isolated STIC patients out of 21 publications were included in our analysis with a pooled median follow-up of 36 (interquartile range (IQR): 25.3-84) months. 71.4% of the patients had peritoneal washings (negative: 62.5%, positive: 8%, atypic cells: 0.9%). Surgical staging was performed in 28.6% of all STICs and did not show any malignancies. 14 out of 112 (12.5%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Eight (7.1%) patients developed a recurrence 42.5 (IQR: 33-72) months after isolated STIC diagnosis. Cumulative incidence of HGSC after five (ten) years was 10.5% (21.6%). Recurrence occurred only in Conclusion: The rate of HGSC after an isolated STIC diagnosis was 7.1% with a cumulative incidence of 10.5% (21.6%) after five (ten) years. HGSC was only observed in Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021278340.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.