Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluation of different

Aditya Bansal, Shalini Sharma, Benedikt Klasen, Frank Rösch, Mukesh K Pandey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First-in-human dosimetry and biodistribution of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. First-in-human infection imaging withFrontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditya BansalDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Shalini SharmaDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Benedikt KlasenDepartment of Chemistry-TRIGA Site, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Frank RöschDepartment of Chemistry-TRIGA Site, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Mukesh K PandeyDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA. pandey.mukesh@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell based therapies are evolving as an effective new approach to treat various diseases. To understand the safety, efficacy, and mechanism of action of cell-based therapies, it is imperative to follow their biodistribution noninvasively. Positron-emission-tomography (PET)-based non-invasive imaging of cell trafficking offers such a potential. Herein, we evaluated and compared three different ready-to-use direct cell radiolabeling synthons, [

Indexed as

RadioisotopesZirconiumAnimalsLeukocytesMiceMice, NudeStem CellsTissue DistributionTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadioisotopesZirconium

Identifiers

PMID36123386
PMCPMC9485227
OpenAlexW4296347602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.