ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2022
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for senile patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (2 to 4 cm) originating from the muscularis propria layer.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Development of a Digital Nomogram.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic therapy vs. surgical resection in patients with cardia gastrointestinal stromal tumor.PloS one · 2024Article
- Risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Observational
- Development and validation of a preoperative difficulty scoring system for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multi-center study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Currently, there still are no selection criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) versus laparoscopic resection (LR) of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) (2 to 4 cm) originating from the muscularis propria layer (MP-GISTs). Aim: To investigate and compare the long-term prognosis of ER and LR for resecting gastric MP-GISTs, with at least 5 years of follow-up. Material and methods: Between January 2010 and December 2015, 134 patients with gastric MP-GISTs were consecutively enrolled in this study. The main comparison measurements included the short-term and long-term outcomes between the ER group ( Results: In this study, there were no significant differences in the rates of complete resection ( Conclusions: Our results showed that ER was a more feasible treatment approach than LR when the gastric MP-GIST was located in or near the cardia/pylorus. ER also had several other advantages over LR, such as a shorter procedure time, shorter hospital stay, and lower hospitalization costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.