ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2022
Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Characterizing In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Arteries.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inverse finite element identification of murine aortic material properties:Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Non-invasive estimation of material properties of normal and dissected human ascending aortasFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Significance of Dynamic Axial Stretching on Estimating Biomechanical Behavior and Properties of the Human Ascending Aorta.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Study and Analysis for Cardiovascular/Skeletal Materials and Devices.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical properties of the arterial walls could provide meaningful information for the diagnosis, management and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Classically, various experimental approaches were conducted on dissected arterial tissues to obtain their stress-stretch relationship, which has limited value clinically. Therefore, there is a pressing need to obtain biomechanical behaviors of these vascular tissues in vivo for personalized treatment. This paper reviews the methods to quantify arterial mechanical properties in vivo. Among these methods, we emphasize a novel approach using image-based finite element models to iteratively determine the material properties of the arterial tissues. This approach has been successfully applied to arterial walls in various vascular beds. The mechanical properties obtained from the in vivo approach were compared to those from ex vivo experimental studies to investigate whether any discrepancy in material properties exists for both approaches. Arterial tissue stiffness values from in vivo studies generally were in the same magnitude as those from ex vivo studies, but with lower average values. Some methodological issues, including solution uniqueness and robustness; method validation; and model assumptions and limitations were discussed. Clinical applications of this approach were also addressed to highlight their potential in translation from research tools to cardiovascular disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.