Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36136809›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development and Validation of New Exercises to Promote Physical Activity in Nursing Home Settings.

Fanny Buckinx, Lucie Maton, Valentine Dalimier, Alexandre Mouton, Laetitia Lengelé, Jean-Yves Reginster, Olivier Bruyère

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fanny BuckinxWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Lucie MatonResearch Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education (RUCHE), Department of Sport Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Valentine DalimierResearch Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education (RUCHE), Department of Sport Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Alexandre MoutonResearch Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education (RUCHE), Department of Sport Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1690-0383
Laetitia LengeléWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5139-3591
Jean-Yves ReginsterWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-752X
Olivier BruyèreWHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-9393

Funding

Fonds National pour la Recherche Scientifique 1.B.058.22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGAMotion is a giant physical activity board game intended to improve levels of physical activity and a broader array of physical and psychological outcomes among nursing home residents.

objectiveThe aim of the present study is to develop and validate new balance, flexibility, muscle strength, and walking exercises to be included in GAMotion.

methodsA two-step design combining the Focus group and Delphi method was conducted among healthcare professionals divided into two independent samples of experts. The first sample was asked to develop exercises during a focus group. The second sample participated in a two-round Ranking-type Delphi method. During the first round, the participants were asked to rate the exercises developed during the focus group on a four-point Likert scale (from 1: not adapted at all to 4: very adapted). The exercises that did not reach consensus were removed (consensus established: median ≥ 3 on the Likert scale and at least 75% of experts rating the exercises as « adapted » or « very adapted »). During the second round, it was asked to rank the exercises selected at the end of the first round from most suitable to least suitable.

resultsThe Focus group developed nine balance, twelve flexibility, twelve strength, and nine walking exercises. Following the first round of the Delphi method, two exercises in each category did not reach a consensus and were then removed. In the second round, the remaining seven balance, ten flexibility, ten strength, and seven walking exercises were ranked by the experts, and this classification allowed us to determine the four most suitable exercises from each category to be included in the GAMotion.

conclusionA consensus-based approach among healthcare professionals allowed us to contribute to the development of new exercises to promote physical activity in nursing homes. These validated exercises can be included in the GAMotion board game.

Indexed as

balanceflexibilitygaitmuscle strengthphysical exercise

Identifiers

PMID36136809
PMCPMC9498491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.