Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139326›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Comparative Analyses of the Gut Microbiota in Growing Ragdoll Cats and Felinae Cats.

Zongjie Li, Di Di, Qing Sun, Xiaohui Yao, Jianchao Wei, Beibei Li, Ke Liu, Donghua Shao, Yafeng Qiu, Haixia Liu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Effects of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. The Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zongjie LiShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Di DiShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Qing SunShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Xiaohui YaoShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Jianchao WeiShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3246-6273
Beibei LiShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Ke LiuShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Donghua ShaoShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Yafeng QiuShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-0817
Haixia LiuShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Zhanjun ChengNanjing Policedog Insitute of the Ministry of Public Security, Nanjing 210012, China.
Zhiyong MaShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China.
Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute · CNMinistry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFE0101300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, domestic cats are important human companion animals for their appearance and favorable personalities. During the history of their domestication, the morphological and genetic portraits of domestic cats changed significantly from their wild ancestors, and the gut microbial communities of different breeds of cats also apparently differ. In the current study, the gut microbiota of Ragdoll cats and Felinae cats were analyzed and compared. Our data indicated that the diversity and richness of the gut microbiota in the Felinae cats were much higher than in the Ragdoll cats. The taxonomic analyses revealed that the most predominant phyla of the feline gut microbiota were Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Fusobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Campilobacterota, and others, while the most predominant genera were

Indexed as

Felinae catgrowing catgut microbiotamorphological portraitsRagdoll cat

Identifiers

PMID36139326
PMCPMC9494971
OpenAlexW4296312426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.