Evidence mapPaperPMID 36140608Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Biomarkers and Role of Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Antonio Nenna, Mohamad Jawabra, Emanuele Verghi, Francesco Loreni, Francesco Nappi, Mario Lusini, Ciro Mastroianni, Federica Jiritano and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Are RNA Therapies a Solid Foundation or a Frontier Yet to Be Conquered?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. RotarexJournal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. The Roles of microRNAs in the Cardiovascular System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nunzio MontelioneVascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-7045
Vincenzo CataneseVascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Antonio NennaCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4069-6781
Mohamad JawabraCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Emanuele VerghiCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Francesco LoreniCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2577-1843
Francesco NappiCardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, 93200 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-5360
Mario LusiniCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Ciro MastroianniCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Federica JiritanoCardiovascular Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-5686
Giuseppe Filiberto SerrainoCardiovascular Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-9570
Pasquale MastrorobertoCardiovascular Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Francesco Alberto CodispotiVascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Massimo ChelloCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-7068
Francesco SpinelliVascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Francesco StiloVascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITMagna Graecia University · ITCentre Cardiologique du Nord · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an increasingly pathological condition that commonly affects the femoropopliteal arteries. The current fashionable treatment is percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), often with stenting. However, the in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate after the stenting of the femoropopliteal (FP) district remains high. Many techniques have been proposed for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR, such as intravascular brachytherapy, laser atherectomy, second stenting and drug-coated balloons angioplasty (DCB). DCB showed a significantly lower rate of restenosis and target lesions revascularization (TLR) compared to conventional PTA. However, further studies and multi-center RCTs with dedicated long-term follow-up are needed to verify the true efficiency of this approach. Nowadays, the correlation between PAD and inflammation biomarkers is well known. Multiple studies have shown that proinflammatory markers (such as C-reactive proteins) and the high plasma levels of microRNA could predict the outcomes after stent placement. In particular, circulating microRNA-320a, microRNA-3937, microRNA-642a-3p and microRNA-572 appear to hold promise in diagnosing ISR in patients with PAD, but also as predictors of stent patency. This narrative review intends to summarize the current knowledge on the value of circulating biomarkers as predictors of ISR and to foster the scientific debate on the advantages of using DCB in the treatment of ISR in the FP district.

Indexed as

drug-coated balloondrug-eluting balloonin-stent restenosisperipheral arterial disease

Identifiers

PMID36140608
PMCPMC9498042
OpenAlexW4295592334

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.