Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36143274›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Bioradiotherapy with Cetuximab May Reduce the Risk of Neck Node Relapse in Locoregionally Advanced Laryngeal Glottic Carcinoma: May HER1-Profile Be Useful in the Bioselection of Patients?

Giovanni Almadori, Antonella Coli, Eugenio De Corso, Stefano Settimi, Dario Antonio Mele, Francesca Brigato, Domenico Scannone, Jacopo Galli, Vincenzo Valentini, Gaetano Paludetti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni AlmadoriUnit of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonella ColiUnit of Anatomic Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Eugenio De CorsoDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-7018
Stefano SettimiDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-1501
Dario Antonio MeleDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0765-9233
Francesca BrigatoDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Domenico ScannoneUnit of Anatomic Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Jacopo GalliDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ValentiniUnit of Oncologic Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Gaetano PaludettiDepartment of Head, Neck and Sensory Organs, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Libero LauriolaUnit of Anatomic Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Franco Oreste RanellettiUnit of Histology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate survival in patients with advanced glottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated by bioradiotherapy (BioRT) with cetuximab and eventual salvage surgery (group A, n = 66) or upfront surgery (total laryngectomy or near-total laryngectomy) with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) (group B, n = 66). The predictive role of HER1 expression in the bioselection of tumors was evaluated. Relapse-free (RFS), metastasis-free (MFS), overall (OS) survivals, salvageability, and rates of larynx preservation were analyzed. The two groups were balanced by propensity score method on their baseline characteristics. No significant differences in RFS and OS were found, while MFS results were significantly higher in group A (p = 0.04). Group A showed a 22% reduction in the probability of nodal metastasis (p = 0.0023), mostly in tumors with higher HER1 expression. The salvageability with TL at 3 years was 54% after prior BioRT and 18% after prior upfront NTL (p < 0.05). BioRT with cetuximab showed a reduction in the risk of lymph node relapse, particularly in the case of HER1 positive tumors, and it allowed to achieve a higher rate of functional larynx preservation and a higher salvageability compared with upfront surgery. HER1 analysis could be clinically useful in the bioselection of tumors that may benefit from BioRT with cetuximab, particularly in those with neck node metastatic propensity.

Indexed as

cetuximabHER1 expressionlaryngeal cancerradiotherapyupfront surgery

Identifiers

PMID36143274
PMCPMC9504760
OpenAlexW4295539782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.