Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36144129›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2022

Double Immunochromatographic Test System for Sensitive Detection of Phycotoxins Domoic Acid and Okadaic Acid in Seawater and Seafood.

Olga D Hendrickson, Elena A Zvereva, Olga N Solopova, Anatoly V Zherdev, Peter G Sveshnikov, Sergei A Eremin, Boris B Dzantiev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determination of okadaic acid in scallop using microfluidic-based fluorescence polarization immunoassay.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Olga D HendricksonBach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3799-9383
Elena A ZverevaBach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.
Olga N SolopovaBlokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Kashirskoye Shosse 24, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-6094
Anatoly V ZherdevBach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-2839
Peter G SveshnikovRussian Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy, Sympheropolsky Blvrd., 8, 117638 Moscow, Russia.
Sergei A EreminBach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.
Boris B DzantievBach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4008-4918
A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RURussian Research Center for Molecular Diagnostics and Therapy · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationRussian Science Foundation 20-43-07001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this investigation, a double immunochromatographic analysis (ICA) of two relevant phycotoxins, domoic acid (DA) and okadaic acid (OA), was developed for the first time. The ICA was performed in the indirect competitive format using gold nanoparticles conjugated with anti-species antibodies. Under optimal conditions, the instrumental detection limits/cutoffs for simultaneous detection of DA and OA were 1.2/100 and 0.1/2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The time of the assay was 18 min. The ICA was applied to test seawater and a large panel of seafood, including mussels, tiger shrimps, octopuses, whelks, crabs, and scallops. The proposed simple sample preparation method for seafood takes only 20 min. For seawater, a dilution by buffer was implemented. The assay recoveries varied from 80.8% to 124.5%. The competitive potential of the proposed technique as a tool to control natural water and seafood samples is determined by its simplicity, rapidity, and sensitivity.

Indexed as

food securityimmunochromatographic analysismarine toxinsseafoodseawater

Identifiers

PMID36144129
PMCPMC9505318
OpenAlexW4295850129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.