Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36145266›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Plant Metabolites as SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitors Candidates: In Silico and In Vitro Studies.

Alberto Jorge Oliveira Lopes, Gustavo Pereira Calado, Yuri Nascimento Fróes, Sandra Alves de Araújo, Lucas Martins França, Antonio Marcus de Andrade Paes, Sebastião Vieira de Morais, Cláudia Quintino da Rocha, Cleydlenne Costa Vasconcelos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Geopropolis fromMetabolites · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Jorge Oliveira LopesFederal Institute of Science Education and Technology of Maranhão-Campus Santa Inês, Castelo Branco, s/n-Canaã, Santa Inês 65300-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-9500
Gustavo Pereira CaladoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas-PPGCF, Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade de Brasília-UnB Brasília-DF, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.
Yuri Nascimento FróesLaboratory of Microbial Pathogenicity, CEUMA Univesity, São Luís 65075-120, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-0980
Sandra Alves de AraújoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia/RENORBIO, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-9686
Lucas Martins FrançaPhysiological Sciences Department, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-1539
Antonio Marcus de Andrade PaesPhysiological Sciences Department, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3803-9803
Sebastião Vieira de MoraisPhysiological Sciences Department, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.
Cláudia Quintino da RochaChemistry Department, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-1869
Cleydlenne Costa VasconcelosChemistry Department, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRInstituto Federal do Maranhão · BRUniversidade Ceuma · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA) COVID-19-00751/20.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since it acquired pandemic status, SARS-CoV-2 has been causing all kinds of damage all over the world. More than 6.3 million people have died, and many cases of sequelae are in survivors. Currently, the only products available to most of the world's population to fight the pandemic are vaccines, which still need improvement since the number of new cases, admissions into intensive care units, and deaths are again reaching worrying rates, which makes it essential to compounds that can be used during infection, reducing the impacts of the disease. Plant metabolites are recognized sources of diverse biological activities and are the safest way to research anti-SARS-CoV-2 compounds. The present study computationally evaluated 55 plant compounds in five SARS-CoV-2 targets such Main Protease (Mpro or 3CL or MainPro), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), Papain-Like Protease (PLpro), NSP15 Endoribonuclease, Spike Protein (Protein S or Spro) and human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) followed by in vitro evaluation of their potential for the inhibition of the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 Spro with human ACE-2. The in silico results indicated that, in general, amentoflavone, 7-O-galloylquercetin, kaempferitrin, and gallagic acid were the compounds with the strongest electronic interaction parameters with the selected targets. Through the data obtained, we can demonstrate that although the indication of individual interaction of plant metabolites with both Spro and ACE-2, the metabolites evaluated were not able to inhibit the interaction between these two structures in the in vitro test. Despite this, these molecules still must be considered in the research of therapeutic agents for treatment of patients affected by COVID-19 since the activity on other targets and influence on the dynamics of viral infection during the interaction Spro x ACE-2 should be investigated.

Indexed as

in silico protocolsmedicinal chemistrynatural productsnew drugs agents

Identifiers

PMID36145266
PMCPMC9501068
OpenAlexW4293220824

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.