Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146103›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensor-Based Technologies for Fall Risk Assessment in Older Adults.

Manting Chen, Hailiang Wang, Lisha Yu, Eric Hiu Kwong Yeung, Jiajia Luo, Kwok-Leung Tsui, Yang Zhao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06508892 (Using Consumer-grade Wearable Devices for Fall Risk Evaluation and Alerts), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06508892 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Using Consumer-grade Wearable Devices for Fall Risk Evaluation and Alerts

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsMass ScreeningArmsrisk of fall
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manting ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9543-4367
Hailiang WangSchool of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-7947
Lisha YuShenzhen Enstech Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China.
Eric Hiu Kwong YeungDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Jiajia LuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Kwok-Leung TsuiGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Yang ZhaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, China.

Funding

Sun Yat-Sen University 58000-31610013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls have been recognized as the major cause of accidental death and injury in people aged 65 and above. The timely prediction of fall risks can help identify older adults prone to falls and implement preventive interventions. Recent advancements in wearable sensor-based technologies and big data analysis have spurred the development of accurate, affordable, and easy-to-use approaches to fall risk assessment. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the current state of wearable sensor-based technologies for fall risk assessment among community-dwelling older adults. Twenty-five of 614 identified research articles were included in this review. A comprehensive comparison was conducted to evaluate these approaches from several perspectives. In general, these approaches provide an accurate and effective surrogate for fall risk assessment. The accuracy of fall risk prediction can be influenced by various factors such as sensor location, sensor type, features utilized, and data processing and modeling techniques. Features constructed from the raw signals are essential for predictive model development. However, more investigations are needed to identify distinct, clinically interpretable features and develop a general framework for fall risk assessment based on the integration of sensor technologies and data modeling.

Indexed as

Independent LivingWearable Electronic DevicesAgedHumansRisk Assessmentcommunity-dwelling older adultsfall risk assessmentfunctional testsensor technology

Identifiers

PMID36146103
PMCPMC9504041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.