ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public health implications of allergic rhinitis information on YouTube and Bilibili: a cross-cultural analysis of content quality, engagement, and seasonal trends.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Assessing the content and quality of deep vein thrombosis on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Content, quality, and reliability of gout-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of TikTok videos on sudden cardiac death varies by video characteristics and health information accuracy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos on acute myeloid leukemia on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of irritable bowel syndrome-related medical information on major video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Public Attention to Mpox in China During the Pandemic: Qualitative Analysis of TikTok Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Quality of information in osteoporosis videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- Acute Knee Injury-Related TikTok Videos Are Frequently Inaccurate, Incomplete, and Created by Nonphysicians.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Assessment of information quality and reliability on ankle sprains in short videos from Douyin and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quality of cerebral palsy videos on Chinese social media platforms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Quality of information in gestational diabetes mellitus videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of NAFLD-related health videos on TikTok: a cross-language study in the USA and China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- TikTok and pediatric nephrology: content quality assessment of videos related to pediatric kidney disease and kidney transplant.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- TikTok as a Resource for Fertility Information and Support: A Patient Survey.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2024Article
- The impact of verbal behavior on audience engagement in Chinese talk shows: Based on a novel mediation model.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Douyin and Bilibili as sources of information on lung cancer in China through assessment and analysis of the content and quality.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Qualitative research on undergraduate nursing students' recognition and response to short videos' health disinformation.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), also known as the broken heart syndrome or stress cardiomyopathy, is increasing worldwide. The understanding of its prognosis has been progressively evolving and currently appears to be poorer than previously thought, which has attracted the attention of researchers. An attempt to recognize the awareness of this condition among the general population drove us to analyze the dissemination of this topic on TikTok, a popular short-video-based social media platform. We found a considerable number of videos on TTS on TikTok; however, the quality of the presented information remains unknown.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the quality and audience engagement of TTS-related videos on TikTok.
methodsVideos on the TikTok platform were explored on August 2, 2021 to identify those related to TTS by using 6 Chinese keywords. A total of 2549 videos were found, of which 80 met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated for their characteristics, content, quality, and reliability. The quality and reliability were rated using the DISCERN instrument and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria by 2 reviewers independently, and a score was assigned. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between audience engagement and other factors such as video content, video quality, and author types.
resultsThe scores assigned to the selected video content were low with regard to the diagnosis (0.66/2) and management (0.34/2) of TTS. The evaluated videos were found to have an average score of 36.93 out of 80 on the DISCERN instrument and 1.51 out of 4 per the JAMA criteria. None of the evaluated videos met all the JAMA criteria. The quality of the relayed information varied by source (All P<.05). TTS-related videos made by health care professionals accounted for 28% (22/80) of all the evaluated videos and had the highest DISCERN scores with an average of 40.59 out of 80. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that author types that identified as health professionals (exponentiated regression coefficient 17.48, 95% CI 2.29-133.52; P=.006) and individual science communicators (exponentiated regression coefficient 13.38, 95% CI 1.83-97.88; P=.01) were significant and independent determinants of audience engagement (in terms of the number of likes). Other author types of videos, video content, and DISCERN document scores were not associated with higher likes.
conclusionsWe found that the quality of videos regarding TTS for patient education on TikTok is poor. Patients should be cautious about health-related information on TikTok. The formulation of a measure for video quality review is necessary, especially when the purpose of the published content is to educate and increase awareness on a health-related topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.