Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36157327›Full record

ArticleJournal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO2022

Robotic Emulation of Candidate Prosthetic Foot Designs May Enable Efficient, Evidence-Based, and Individualized Prescriptions.

Joshua M Caputo, Evan Dvorak, Kate Shipley, Mary Ann Miknevich, Peter G Adamczyk, Steven H Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. User preference in the personalized control of an ankle prosthesis: a case study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design, Control, and Evaluation of a Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Emulator.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua M CaputoJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Evan DvorakJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kate ShipleyJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mary Ann MiknevichJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Peter G AdamczykJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Steven H CollinsJOSHUA M. CAPUTO, PhD, is affiliated with Humotech (Human Motion Technologies LLC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Clinic-based Robotic Prosthesis Emulator for Amputee Gait Capacity AssessmentR43HD076518 · NICHD · INTELLIGENT PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS, LLC · PI ADAMCZYK, PETER G · 2013 to 2013
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The design and selection of lower-limb prosthetic devices is currently hampered by a shortage of evidence to drive the choice of prosthetic foot parameters. We propose a new approach wherein prostheses could be designed, specified, and provided based on individualized measurements of the benefits provided by candidate feet. In this manuscript, we present a pilot test of this evidence-based and personalized process. Methods: We previously developed a "prosthetic foot emulator," a wearable robotic system that provides users with the physical sensation of trying on different prosthetic feet before definitive fitting. Here we detail preliminary demonstrations of two possible approaches to personalizing foot design: 1) an emulation and test-drive strategy of representative commercial foot models, and 2) a prosthetist-driven tuning procedure to optimize foot parameters. Results: The first experiment demonstrated large and sometimes surprising differences in optimal prosthetic foot parameters across a variety of subjects, walking conditions, and outcome measures. The second experiment demonstrated a quick and effective simple manual tuning procedure for identifying preferred prosthetic foot parameters. Conclusions: Emulator-based approaches could improve individualization of prosthetic foot prescription. The present results motivate future clinical studies of the validity, efficacy, and economics of the approach across larger and more diverse subject populations. Clinical Relevance: Today, emulator technology is being used to accelerate research and development of novel prosthetic and orthotic devices. In the future, after further refinement and validation, this technology could benefit clinical practice by providing a means for rapid test-driving and optimal selection of clinically available prosthetic feet.

Indexed as

amputationankleemulatorprosthesistest-drivewalking

Identifiers

PMID36157327
PMCPMC9481294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.