Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158211›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Transcriptional regulation of INK4/ARF locus by cis and trans mechanisms.

Umer Farooq, Dimple Notani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Potential Links Between ANRIL and MiRNAs in Various Cancers.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Long noncoding RNAs in ubiquitination, protein degradation, and human diseases.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High frequency of melanoma inTheranostics · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umer FarooqGenetics and Development, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute for Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.
Dimple NotaniGenetics and Development, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute for Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

9p21 locus is one of the most reproducible regions in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The region harbors

Indexed as

9p21ANRILCDKN2BASenhancergene desertINK4/ARFp15INK4bp16INK4a

Identifiers

PMID36158211
PMCPMC9500187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.