Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36158659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Differentiation between spinal multiple myeloma and metastases originated from lung using multi-view attention-guided network.

Kaili Chen, Jiashi Cao, Xin Zhang, Xiang Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Qingchu Li, Song Chen, Peng Wang, Tielong Liu, Juan Du and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and validation of MRI-based radiomics models for predicting recurrence in patients with spine and pelvis chordomas.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaili ChenDepartment of Hematology, Myeloma & Lymphoma Center, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Changzheng Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Jiashi CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, No. 455 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai 455 Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhangInstitute for Medical Image Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Xiangyu ZhaoInstitute for Medical Image Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qingchu LiDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Song ChenDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Tielong LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spine Tumor Center, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Changzheng Hospital of the Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Juan DuDepartment of Hematology, Myeloma & Lymphoma Center, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Changzheng Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Shiyuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Huangpu, China.
Lichi ZhangInstitute for Medical Image Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) and metastasis originated are the two common malignancy diseases in the spine. They usually show similar imaging patterns and are highly demanded to differentiate for precision diagnosis and treatment planning. The objective of this study is therefore to construct a novel deep-learning-based method for effective differentiation of two diseases, with the comparative study of traditional radiomics analysis. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 217 patients with 269 lesions, who were diagnosed with spinal MM (79 cases, 81 lesions) or spinal metastases originated from lung cancer (138 cases, 188 lesions) confirmed by postoperative pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences of all patients were collected and reviewed. A novel deep learning model of the Multi-view Attention-Guided Network (MAGN) was constructed based on contrast-enhanced T1WI (CET1) sequences. The constructed model extracts features from three views (sagittal, coronal and axial) and fused them for a more comprehensive differentiation analysis, and the attention guidance strategy is adopted for improving the classification performance, and increasing the interpretability of the method. The diagnostic efficiency among MAGN, radiomics model and the radiologist assessment were compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Ablation studies were conducted to demonstrate the validity of multi-view fusion and attention guidance strategies: It has shown that the diagnostic model using multi-view fusion achieved higher diagnostic performance [ACC (0.79), AUC (0.77) and F1-score (0.67)] than those using single-view (sagittal, axial and coronal) images. Besides, MAGN incorporating attention guidance strategy further boosted performance as the ACC, AUC and F1-scores reached 0.81, 0.78 and 0.71, respectively. In addition, the MAGN outperforms the radiomics methods and radiologist assessment. The highest ACC, AUC and F1-score for the latter two methods were 0.71, 0.76 & 0.54, and 0.69, 0.71, & 0.65, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed MAGN can achieve satisfactory performance in differentiating spinal MM between metastases originating from lung cancer, which also outperforms the radiomics method and radiologist assessment.

Indexed as

attention guidance strategydeep learninglung cancermultiple myeloma (MM)radiomicsspinal metastases

Identifiers

PMID36158659
PMCPMC9495278

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.