Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36159774›Full record

ReviewGenetic resources and crop evolution2022

A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives.

Kandhalu Sagadevan Dinesh Babu, Vardhana Janakiraman, Harunipriya Palaniswamy, Lakshmi Kasirajan, Raju Gomathi, Thakku R Ramkumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antifungal metabolites fromRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Enhancement of aPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kandhalu Sagadevan Dinesh BabuDepartment of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, TN 610005 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-1433
Vardhana JanakiramanDepartment of Biotechnology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced studies (VISTAS), Chennai, TN 600117 India.
Harunipriya PalaniswamyTissue Culture Laboratory, Division of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, TN 641007 India.
Lakshmi KasirajanGenomics Laboratory, Division of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, TN 641007 India.
Raju GomathiPlant Physiology Laboratory, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, TN 641007 India.
Thakku R RamkumarAgronomy Department, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9739-244X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane (

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic transformationGenome sequencingMarker-assisted selectionNobilizationOrigin and domesticationSugarcaneTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36159774
PMCPMC9483297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.