Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Compare the physicochemical and biological properties of engineered polymer-functionalized silver nanoparticles against

Meng Zhang, Edward C M Lo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meng ZhangFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Edward C M LoFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Some polymer-functionalized AgNPs (P-AgNPs) have been developed to optimize the biological properties of AgNPs. However, there are no studies in the literature comparing the differences in physicochemical and biological properties of AgNPs caused by various polymer-functionalizations and providing evidence for the selection of polymers to optimize AgNPs. Methods: Two AgNPs with similar nano-size and opposite surface charges were synthesized and functionalized by seven polymers. Their physicochemical properties were evaluated by UV-Visible absorption, dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. Their biological properties against Results: Comparative analysis found that there were no significant differences between P-AgNPs and AgNPs in nano-size and in surface charge. Raman spectroscopy analysis provided evidence about the attachment of polymers on AgNPs. For antibacterial property, among the negatively charged AgNPs, only polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-functionalized AgNPs-1 showed a significant lower MIC value than AgNPs-1 (0.79 vs. 4.72 μg/ml). Among the positively charged AgNPs, the MIC values of all P-AgNPs (0.34-4.37 μg/ml) were lower than that of AgNPs-2 (13.89 μg/ml), especially PVP- and Pluronic127-AgNPs-2 (1.75 and 0.34 μg/ml). For antibiofilm property, PVP-AgNPs-1 (7.86 μg/ml, Conclusion: Among the polymers studied, polymer functionalization does not significantly alter the physical properties of AgNPs, but modifies their surface chemical property. These modifications, especially the functionalization of PVP, contribute to optimize the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of AgNPs, while not causing cytotoxicity at the MIC level.

Indexed as

antibacterialantibiofilmcytotoxicitypolymersPorphyromonas gingivalissilver nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID36160232
PMCPMC9493255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.