ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022
Prediction of prognosis and survival of patients with gastric cancer by a weighted improved random forest model: an application of machine learning in medicine.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Computational identification and validation of non-coding rna biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- The impact of CNN MHAM-enhanced WRF and BPNN models for user behavior prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survival Modelling Using Machine Learning and Immune-Nutritional Profiles in Advanced Gastric Cancer on Home Parenteral Nutrition.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Predicting chemotherapy responsiveness in gastric cancer through machine learning analysis of genome, immune, and neutrophil signatures.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Article
- From data to decision: an interpretable machine learning model for optimizing RAI therapy in Graves' hyperthyroidism.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- An improved random forest algorithm for tracing the origin of metastatic renal cancer tissues.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an inflammatory biomarkers model to predict gastric cancer prognosis: a multi-center cohort study in China.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A novel CT-based radiomics model for predicting response and prognosis of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Gut mycobiome as a potential non-invasive tool in early detection of lung adenocarcinoma: a cross-sectional study.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Beneficial role of kaempferol and its derivatives from different plant sources on respiratory diseases in experimental models.Inflammopharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It is essential to predict the survival status of patients based on their prognosis. This can assist physicians in evaluating treatment decisions. Random forest is an excellent machine learning algorithm even without any modification. We propose a new random forest weighting method and apply it to the gastric cancer patient data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We evaluated the generalization ability of this weighted random forest algorithm on 10 public medical datasets. Furthermore, for the same weighting mode, the difference between using out-of-bag (OOB) data and all training sets as the weighting basis is explored. Material and methods: 110 697 cases of gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2016 obtained from the SEER database were included in the experiment. In addition, 10 public medical datasets were used for the generalization ability evaluation of this weighted random forest algorithm. Results: Through experimental verification, on the SEER gastric cancer patient data, the weighted random forest algorithm improves the accuracy by 0.79% compared with the original random forest. In AUC, macro-averaging increased by 2.32% and micro-averaging increased by 0.51% on average. Among the 10 public datasets, the random forest weighted in accuracy has the best performance on 6 datasets, with an average increase of 1.44% in accuracy and an average increase of 1.2% in AUC. Conclusions: Compared with the original random forest, the weighted random forest model shows a significant improvement in performance, and the effect of using all training data as the weighting basis is better than using OOB data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.