Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36160349›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022

Prediction of prognosis and survival of patients with gastric cancer by a weighted improved random forest model: an application of machine learning in medicine.

Cheng Xu, Jing Wang, Tianlong Zheng, Yue Cao, Fan Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting chemotherapy responsiveness in gastric cancer through machine learning analysis of genome, immune, and neutrophil signatures.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheng XuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Jing WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Tianlong ZhengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Yue CaoSchool of Higher Vocational Education, Nanjing University of the Arts, Nanjing, China.
Fan YeSchool of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is essential to predict the survival status of patients based on their prognosis. This can assist physicians in evaluating treatment decisions. Random forest is an excellent machine learning algorithm even without any modification. We propose a new random forest weighting method and apply it to the gastric cancer patient data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We evaluated the generalization ability of this weighted random forest algorithm on 10 public medical datasets. Furthermore, for the same weighting mode, the difference between using out-of-bag (OOB) data and all training sets as the weighting basis is explored. Material and methods: 110 697 cases of gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2016 obtained from the SEER database were included in the experiment. In addition, 10 public medical datasets were used for the generalization ability evaluation of this weighted random forest algorithm. Results: Through experimental verification, on the SEER gastric cancer patient data, the weighted random forest algorithm improves the accuracy by 0.79% compared with the original random forest. In AUC, macro-averaging increased by 2.32% and micro-averaging increased by 0.51% on average. Among the 10 public datasets, the random forest weighted in accuracy has the best performance on 6 datasets, with an average increase of 1.44% in accuracy and an average increase of 1.2% in AUC. Conclusions: Compared with the original random forest, the weighted random forest model shows a significant improvement in performance, and the effect of using all training data as the weighting basis is better than using OOB data.

Indexed as

algorithm improvementgastric cancermachine learningprognosisrandom forestSEERsurvival time

Identifiers

PMID36160349
PMCPMC9479734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.