SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2023
Efficacy of low or heavy rituximab‑based protocols and comparison with seven regimens in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing treatment in PMN: efficacy and safety of rituximab-based regimens.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- A meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of obinuzumab for membranous nephropathy.Sage open chronic diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNumerous studies have demonstrated the efficiency of tacrolimus + rituximab and rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). But optimal dosages of rituximab for IMN are still controversial. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of different rituximab dosages and other main treatments in IMN treatment.
methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies analyzing nine therapeutic regimens for IMN were included from some databases. Network comparisons were performed to analyze the rates of total remission (TR) and relapse rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions.
resultsTwelve RCTs and 12 observational studies involving 1724 patients were pooled for comparison of 9 interventions. This NMA demonstrated steroids + tacrolimus was ranked first in the aspect of total remission at 6 months (92%) and 12 months (81.3%). The total remission rate associated with tacrolimus + rituximab increased rapidly between the sixth (SUCRA 22.5%) and the twelfth month (SUCRA 63.9%). Tacrolimus and cyclosporine A were associated with higher total remission at 6 months (78.8% and 65.4%, separately) and decreased at 12 months (58.1 and 34.9%, separately). Steroids + cyclophosphamide, rituximab (Heavy dose) and rituximab (Low dose) had stable remission rates at 6 (63.7%, 46.6%, and 19.4%) and 12 months (SUCRA 66.9%, 39.6%, and 28.8%). Tacrolimus and cyclosporine A were associated with a significantly higher risk of relapse than that with steroids + cyclophosphamide, rituximab (Heavy dose), and rituximab (Low dose).
conclusionsFor IMN in adults, steroids + tacrolimus was ranked first in the aspect of total remission, followed by steroids + cyclophosphamide and steroids + cyclosporine A. The TR associated with rituximab (Heavy and Low dosage) at 12 months was higher than that at 6 months. And rituximab (Heavy dose) achieves a higher rate of total remission than that of rituximab (Low dose).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.