ArticleData in brief2022
Dataset for human fall recognition in an uncontrolled environment.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficiency and Temporal Reasoning in Transformer-Based Video Object Detection: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Graph Topology-Guided Multi-Task Learning for Fall Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging the visual-to-physical gap: physically aligned representations for fall risk analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- GMDCSA-24: A dataset for human fall detection in videos.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a dataset (CAUCAFall) with ten subjects, which simulates five types of falls and five types of activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, the data include forward falls, backward falls, lateral falls left, lateral falls right, and falls arising from sitting. The participants performed the following ADLs: walking, hopping, picking up an object, sitting, and kneeling. The dataset considers individuals of different ages, weights, heights, and dominant legs. The data were acquired using an RGB camera in a home environment. This environment was intentionally realistic and included uncontrolled features, such as occlusions, lighting changes (natural, artificial, and night), participants different clothing, movement in the background, different textures on the floor and in the room, and a variety in fall angles and different distances from the camera to the fall. The dataset consists of 10 folders, one for each subject, and each folder includes ten subfolders with the performed activities. Each folder contains the video of the action and all the images of that action. CAUCAFall is the only database that contains details of the lighting lux of the scenarios, the distances from the human fall to the camera and the angles of the different falls with reference to the camera. The dataset is also the only one that contains labels for each image. Frames including human falls recorded were labeled as ``fall'', and ADL activities were marked ``nofall". This dataset is useful for developing and evaluating modern fall recognition algorithms, such as those that apply feature extraction, convolutional neural networks with YOLOv3-v4 detectors, and camera location and resolution increase the performance of algorithms such as OPENPOSE. Thus, the dataset enables knowledge of the real progress of research in this area since existing datasets are used in strictly controlled environments. The authors intend to contribute a dataset with real-world housing environments characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.