Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167150›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2022

Regeneration and developmental enhancers are differentially compatible with minimal promoters.

Ian J Begeman, Benjamin Emery, Andrew Kurth, Junsu Kang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Enhancer Dynamics for Gene Regulation in the Cardiovascular System.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian J BegemanDepartment of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Benjamin EmeryDepartment of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Andrew KurthDepartment of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Junsu KangDepartment of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA; UW Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. Electronic address: junsu.kang@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Justine Yang Bruce · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Training Program in Translational Cardiovascular Science (TPTCS)T32HL007936 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lee Lochbaum Eckhardt, Gail A Robertson · 2001 to 2026
$11.6M
Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Fin Regeneration in ZebrafishR35GM137878 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Junsu Kang · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
Dissecting injury-responsive gene expression during zebrafish heart regenerationR01HL151522 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Junsu Kang · 2021 to 2026
$2.6M
Dissecting Regulatory Mechanisms of Cardiac Regeneration EnhancersF31HL162492 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEGEMAN, IAN · 2022 to 2024
$104k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 16SDG30020001NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL162492NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151522NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007936NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancers and promoters are cis-regulatory elements that control gene expression. Enhancers are activated in a cell type-, tissue-, and condition-specific manner to stimulate promoter function and transcription. Zebrafish have emerged as a powerful animal model for examining the activities of enhancers derived from various species through transgenic enhancer assays, in which an enhancer is coupled with a minimal promoter. However, the efficiency of minimal promoters and their compatibility with multiple developmental and regeneration enhancers have not been systematically tested in zebrafish. Thus, we assessed the efficiency of six minimal promoters and comprehensively interrogated the compatibility of the promoters with developmental and regeneration enhancers. We found that the fos minimal promoter and Drosophila synthetic core promoter (DSCP) yielded high rates of leaky expression that may complicate the interpretation of enhancer assays. Notably, the adenovirus E1b promoter, the zebrafish lepb 0.8-kb (P0.8) and lepb 2-kb (P2) promoters, and a new zebrafish synthetic promoter (ZSP) that combines elements of the E1b and P0.8 promoters drove little or no ectopic expression, making them suitable for transgenic assays. We also found significant differences in compatibility among specific combinations of promoters and enhancers, indicating the importance of promoters as key regulatory elements determining the specificity of gene expression. Our study provides guidelines for transgenic enhancer assays in zebrafish to aid in the discovery of functional enhancers regulating development and regeneration.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticZebrafishAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaPromoter Regions, GeneticDevelopmentEnhancerPromoterRegenerationTransgenesisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36167150
PMCPMC10211259
OpenAlexW4296940635

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.