Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36167377›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Geriatric assessment and management with question prompt list using a web-based application for elderly patients with cancer (MAPLE) to communicate ageing-related concerns: J-SUPPORT 2101 study protocol for a multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

Ayumu Matsuoka, Maiko Fujimori, Boku Narikazu, Atsuo Takashima, Takuji Okusaka, Keita Mori, Tatsuo Akechi, Taichi Shimazu, Ayumi Okizaki, Tempei Miyaji and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ayumu MatsuokaDivision of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Maiko FujimoriDivision of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan mfujimor@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-3390
Boku NarikazuDepartment of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuo TakashimaDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuji OkusakaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keita MoriClinical Trial Coodination Office, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tatsuo AkechiDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Medical School, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
Taichi ShimazuDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-9830
Ayumi OkizakiDivision of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Tempei MiyajiDepartment of Clinical Trial Data Management, Tokyo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MajimaNPO Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Japan, Tokyo, UK.
Fumio NagashimaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke UchitomiDivision of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElderly cancer patients often have ageing-related physical and psychosocial problems that should be fully shared with their oncologists. Geriatric assessment (GA) can assess these ageing-related problems and guide management. Communication support might also facilitate implementation of GA-guided management. We will conduct a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a programme that combines a GA summary, management recommendations and communication support to facilitate ageing-related communications between elderly Japanese patients with cancer and their oncologists, and thus to implement programme-guided management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit a total of 210 patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with incurable cancers of gastrointestinal origin, and referred for first-line or second-line chemotherapy. In the intervention arm, a summary of management recommendations based on a GA and question prompt list (QPL) will be provided to patients and shared with their oncologists at the first outpatient visit after randomisation by trained intervention providers. For 5 months after the initial intervention, implementation of GA-guided management recommendations will be reviewed monthly with the patients and their oncologists to implement management as needed. The GA and QPL will be re-evaluated at 3 months, with a summary provided to patients and their oncologists. Those participants allocated to the usual care arm will receive usual oncology care. The primary endpoint is the number of conversations about ageing-related concerns at the first outpatient visit after randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center Japan on 15 April 2021 (ID: 2020-592). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000045428.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsAgedAgingHumansInternetMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicgeriatric medicineoncologypalliative care

Identifiers

PMID36167377
PMCPMC9516071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.