Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168234›Full record

ReviewIndoor air2022

Bioaerosol and microbial exposures from residential evaporative coolers and their potential health outcomes: A review.

James D Johnston, Ashlin E Cowger, K Scott Weber

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indoor air, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James D JohnstonDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-7241
Ashlin E CowgerThunder Biotech, Inc, Provo, Utah, USA.
K Scott WeberDepartment of Microbiology & Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3688-2191
Brigham Young University · US490 BioTech (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaporative cooling is an energy efficient form of air conditioning in dry climates that functions by pulling hot, dry outdoor air across a wet evaporative pad. While evaporative coolers can help save energy, they also have the potential to influence human health. Studies have shown residential evaporative coolers may pull outdoor air pollutants into the home or contribute to elevated levels of indoor bioaerosols that may be harmful to health. There is also evidence that evaporative coolers can enable a diverse microbial environment that may confer early-life immunological protection against the development of allergies and asthma or exacerbate these same hypersensitivities. This review summarizes the current knowledge of bioaerosol and microbiological studies associated with evaporative coolers, focusing on harmful and potentially helpful outcomes from their use. We evaluate the effects of evaporative coolers on indoor bacterial endotoxins, fungal β-(1 → 3)-D-glucans, dust mite antigens, residential microbial communities, and Legionella pneumophila. To our knowledge, this is the first review to summarize and evaluate studies on the influence that evaporative coolers have on the bioaerosol and microbiological profile of homes. This brings to light a gap in the literature on evaporative coolers, which is the lack of data on health effects associated with their use.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorDustEndotoxinsGlucansHousingHumansAir PollutantsDustEndotoxinsGlucansbioaerosolendotoxinevaporative coolerhouse dust miteswamp coolerβ-(1 → 3)-D-glucan

Identifiers

PMID36168234
PMCPMC9826010
OpenAlexW4296260762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.