Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168893›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2023

Perspectives of (/memorandum for) systems thinking on COVID-19 pandemic and pathology.

Felix Tretter, Eva M J Peters, Joachim Sturmberg, Jeanette Bennett, Eberhard Voit, Johannes W Dietrich, Gary Smith, Wolfram Weckwerth, Zvi Grossman, Olaf Wolkenhauer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Felix TretterBertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-1220
Eva M J PetersPsychoneuroimmunology Laboratory, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Joachim SturmbergCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-6281
Jeanette BennettDepartment of Psychological Science, StressWAVES Biobehavioral Research Lab, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8487-9774
Eberhard VoitWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Johannes W DietrichDiabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Section, Department of Medicine I, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr Philosophy, Bochum, Germany.
Gary SmithInternational Society for the Systems Sciences, Pontypool, UK.
Wolfram WeckwerthVienna Metabolomics Center (VIME) and Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Zvi GrossmanDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Olaf WolkenhauerDepartment of Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
James A MarcumDepartment of Philosophy, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-1868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is data-driven analysis sufficient for understanding the COVID-19 pandemic and for justifying public health regulations? In this paper, we argue that such analysis is insufficient. Rather what is needed is the identification and implementation of over-arching hypothesis-related and/or theory-based rationales to conduct effective SARS-CoV2/COVID-19 (Corona) research. To that end, we analyse and compare several published recommendations for conceptual and methodological frameworks in medical research (e.g., public health, preventive medicine and health promotion) to current research approaches in medical Corona research. Although there were several efforts published in the literature to develop integrative conceptual frameworks before the COVID-19 pandemic, such as social ecology for public health issues and systems thinking in health care, only a few attempts to utilize these concepts can be found in medical Corona research. For this reason, we propose nested and integrative systemic modelling approaches to understand Corona pandemic and Corona pathology. We conclude that institutional efforts for knowledge integration and systemic thinking, but also for integrated science, are urgently needed to avoid or mitigate future pandemics and to resolve infection pathology.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Systems AnalysisRNA, Viralintegrative systems pathology of Coronamethodology of systemic modellingsocial ecology of pandemicssystems science and thinking

Identifiers

PMID36168893
PMCPMC9538129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.