Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36168913›Full record

ArticleAccountability in research2024

Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Elise M Smith, Corisa Rakestraw, Jeffrey S Farroni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accountability in research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elise M SmithDepartment of Bioethics and Health Humanities, School of Public and Population Health, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-8204
Corisa RakestrawDepartment of Bioethics and Health Humanities, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Jeffrey S FarroniDepartment of Bioethics and Health Humanities, School of Public and Population Health, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To rapidly respond to the COVID-19 public health crisis, researchers have been called upon to prioritize pandemic research, while simultaneously modifying their existing research to maintain the safety of all stakeholders. This study aims to explore the experiences of health science researchers in their scientific practices, research priorities, and professional relational dynamics due to COVID-19. Specifically, we interviewed 31 researchers from diverse fields at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Participants worked on COVID-19, non-COVID-19 related research, or both. We integrated inductive and deductive coding using a thematic coding method. The following four themes were explored: 1) impact of research, 2) research priorities, 3) professional relationships and 4) contextual influences on science. Participants were drawn to COVID-19 work for a diversity of reasons including social need, scientific interest, professional duty, and increased access to funding opportunities. While collaborations have increased for COVID-19 researchers, interpersonal relationships have been challenging for participants. Additionally, political, familial, and personal stresses due to the pandemic have taken a toll on researchers in very different and often inequitable ways. To ensure team cohesion, there is a need to develop research practices, policies and systems that value empathy, flexibility, and interdependence.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansInterpersonal RelationsPandemicsQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelCOVID-19qualitative studyresearch dynamicsresearch practicesresearch prioritiessocial dynamics of scienceteam conflictteam science

Identifiers

PMID36168913
PMCPMC10076447
OpenAlexW4297457253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.