Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170962›Full record

ReviewNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2023

Fluids in the ICU: which is the right one?

Timo Mayerhöfer, Andrew D Shaw, Christian J Wiedermann, Michael Joannidis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Volume therapy: which preparation for which situation?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timo MayerhöferDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andrew D ShawDepartment of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christian J WiedermannInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Care Professions, Lorenz Böhler Street 13, Bolzano, BZ, Italy.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6996-0881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The administration of fluids is one of the most common interventions in the intensive care unit. The effects and side effects of intravenous fluids depend on the amount administered and their specific composition. Intravenous fluid solutions are either considered crystalloids (for example 0.9% saline, lactated Ringer's solution) or colloids (artificial colloids such as gelatins, and albumin). This narrative review summarizes the physiological principles of fluid therapy and reviews the most important studies on crystalloids, artificial colloids and albumin in the context of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

AlbuminsColloidsCrystalloid SolutionsHumansIntensive Care UnitsIsotonic SolutionsAlbuminsColloidsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic Solutionsalbumincolloidscritically illcrystalloids, intravenous fluids

Identifiers

PMID36170962
PMCPMC10310506

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.