ArticleNew microbes and new infections2022
Relevance of prokaryotic subspecies in the age of genomics.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the genome of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis VCRC B668 to understand its mosquitocidal potential for biopesticide development.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Genomic analysis of Massilia antarctica subsp. insulae subsp. nov., a violacein- and aminochelin-producing bacterium isolated from Horseshoe Island, Antarctica.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Metabolomic and genomic insights into Micromonospora carbonacea subsp. caeruleus for anti-colorectal compound.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Uncovering the boundaries ofmSystems · 2024Article
- Hound: a novel tool for automated mapping of genotype to phenotype in bacterial genomes assembled de novo.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Genomic delineation and description of species and within-species lineages in the genusFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of multiple gene sequences, and in particular full genome sequence data, for microbial strains has changed how taxonomists delineate subspecies belonging to the Archaea and Bacteria. Well-defined phylogenetic lineages that share higher genome similarity values compared to the widely used species thresholds are often described as subspecies, despite clear evidence of genetic isolation between them. These well-defined lineages, reflecting notable genetic isolation of the core genome represent more recently evolved, unique and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.