ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Comparison of Preterm Birth and Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Severe Preeclampsia.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of risk factors and construction of nomograph model for critical condition of patients with hypertension during pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Trial
- Predictive values of cervix length measurement based on transvaginal ultrasonography.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Retracted: Clinical Comparison of Preterm Birth and Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Severe Preeclampsia.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe preeclampsia is accompanied by many complications, which is extremely harmful to pregnant women and fetuses. However, in the classification of preterm birth, it is generally divided into spontaneous preterm birth and therapeutic preterm birth, and insufficient attention has been paid to preterm birth in severe preeclampsia. This article aims to explore the clinical difference between preterm birth in severe preeclampsia and spontaneous preterm birth. In the experiment, this paper selected pregnant women who delivered and were treated in a hospital from April 2010 to April 2020 as cases. In terms of grouping, not only are they divided into severe eclampsia group (observation group 1), spontaneous preterm birth group (observation group 2), and general delivery group (control group) according to the cause of premature birth, but also according to the gestational age of severe eclampsia onset, preterm weeks, and other groups. Not only the clinical difference between severe preeclampsia preterm birth and spontaneous preterm birth was compared horizontally, but also the factors affecting the complications of preterm pregnant women, perinatal asphyxia rate, and mortality were longitudinally analyzed. The experimental results in this paper showed that there were significant differences in maternal complications and neonatal mortality between the severe preeclampsia preterm group and the spontaneous preterm group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.