ArticleOpen life sciences2022
Prognostic signature related to the immune environment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Open life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a cancer metastasis-associated risk model via multi-machine-learning algorithms for prognostic risk evaluation and clinical application in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) prognosis remains poor. Here we aimed to identify an effective prognostic signature for predicting the survival of patients with OSCC. Gene-expression and clinical data were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. Immune microenvironment-associated genes were identified using bioinformatics. Subtype and risk-score analyses were performed for these genes. Kaplan-Meier analysis and immune cell infiltration level were explored in different subtypes and risk-score groups. The prognostic ability, independent prognosis, and clinical features of the risk score were assessed. Furthermore, immunotherapy response based on the risk score was explored. Finally, a conjoint analysis of the subtype and risk-score groups was performed to determine the best prognostic combination. We found 11 potential prognostic genes and constructed a risk-score model. The subtype cluster 2 and a high-risk group showed the worst overall survival; differences in survival status might be due to the different immune cell infiltration levels. The risk score showed good performance, independent prognostic value, and valuable clinical application. Higher risk scores showed higher Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion scores, indicating that patients with a high-risk score were less likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Finally, conjoint analysis for the subgroups and risk groups showed the best predictive ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.