ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
The diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography in patients with suspected cardiac masses: A preliminary multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal echocardiographic techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac tumors: applications and recent advances.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The usefulness of contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac masses: a multicenter study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Progress in the Use of Echocardiography in Patients with Tumors.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Timing of Intervention for Left Ventricular Mass in the Setting of Acute Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients with suspected cardiac masses. Methods: A multicenter, prospective study involving 108 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac masses based on transthoracic echocardiography performed between November 2019 and December 2020 was carried out. CE examinations were performed in all patients. The echocardiographic diagnosis was established according to the qualitative (echogenicity, boundary, morphology of the base, mass perfusion, pericardial effusion, and motility) and quantitative (area of the masses and peak intensity ratio of the masses and adjacent myocardium A1/A2) evaluations. Results: Final confirmed diagnoses were as follows: no cardiac mass ( Conclusion: CE has the potential to accurately differentiate cardiac masses by combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. However, more studies with a large sample size should be conducted to further confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR1900026809.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.