Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188130›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2023

A teacher-student framework with Fourier Transform augmentation for COVID-19 infection segmentation in CT images.

Han Chen, Yifan Jiang, Hanseok Ko, Murray Loew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Han ChenSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yifan JiangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hanseok KoSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Murray LoewBiomedical Engineering, George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of infected regions in computed tomography (CT) images is necessary for the initial diagnosis of COVID-19. Deep-learning-based methods have the potential to automate this task but require a large amount of data with pixel-level annotations. Training a deep network with annotated lung cancer CT images, which are easier to obtain, can alleviate this problem to some extent. However, this approach may suffer from a reduction in performance when applied to unseen COVID-19 images during the testing phase, caused by the difference in the image intensity and object region distribution between the training set and test set. In this paper, we proposed a novel unsupervised method for COVID-19 infection segmentation that aims to learn the domain-invariant features from lung cancer and COVID-19 images to improve the generalization ability of the segmentation network for use with COVID-19 CT images. First, to address the intensity difference, we proposed a novel data augmentation module based on Fourier Transform, which transfers the annotated lung cancer data into the style of COVID-19 image. Secondly, to reduce the distribution difference, we designed a teacher-student network to learn rotation-invariant features for segmentation. The experiments demonstrated that even without getting access to the annotations of the COVID-19 CT images during the training phase, the proposed network can achieve a state-of-the-art segmentation performance on COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyCOVID-19Fourier TransformInfection segmentationTeacher–student network

Identifiers

PMID36188130
PMCPMC9510070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.