Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188216›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Pathogenic variation types in human genes relate to diseases through Pfam and InterPro mapping.

Giulia Babbi, Castrense Savojardo, Davide Baldazzi, Pier Luigi Martelli, Rita Casadio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia BabbiBiocomputing Group, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Castrense SavojardoBiocomputing Group, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Davide BaldazziCentro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Aviana, Italy.
Pier Luigi MartelliBiocomputing Group, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rita CasadioBiocomputing Group, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grouping residue variations in a protein according to their physicochemical properties allows a dimensionality reduction of all the possible substitutions in a variant with respect to the wild type. Here, by using a large dataset of proteins with disease-related and benign variations, as derived by merging Humsavar and ClinVar data, we investigate to which extent our physicochemical grouping procedure can help in determining whether patterns of variation types are related to specific groups of diseases and whether they occur in Pfam and/or InterPro gene domains. Here, we download 75,145 germline disease-related and benign variations of 3,605 genes, group them according to physicochemical categories and map them into Pfam and InterPro gene domains. Statistically validated analysis indicates that each cluster of genes associated to Mondo anatomical system categorizations is characterized by a specific variation pattern. Patterns identify specific Pfam and InterPro domain-Mondo category associations. Our data suggest that the association of variation patterns to Mondo categories is unique and may help in associating gene variants to genetic diseases. This work corroborates in a much larger data set previous observations from our group.

Indexed as

disease associated variantInterPro domainmondo anatomical system categoriesPfam domainvariation physicochemical type

Identifiers

PMID36188216
PMCPMC9523224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.