Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36188922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Robotic Rehabilitation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Cerebral Palsy.

Liliane Raess, Rachel L Hawe, Megan Metzler, Ephrem Zewdie, Elizabeth Condliffe, Sean P Dukelow, Adam Kirton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04233710 (Robotic Rehabilitation and Brain Stimulation for Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04233710 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Robotic Rehabilitation and Brain Stimulation for Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2019 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, Perinatal StrokeArmsRobot Rehabilitation + tDCS, Robotic Rehabilitation + sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Grand challenges in pediatric stroke.Frontiers in stroke · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liliane RaessUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rachel L HaweDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Megan MetzlerClinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ephrem ZewdieCalgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Elizabeth CondliffeClinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sean P DukelowDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Adam KirtonClinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To identify challenges of combining robotic upper extremity rehabilitation with tDCS in children with upper extremity bilateral cerebral palsy (CP) by assessing feasibility, tolerability and safety. Methods: This was an unblinded, open-label, pilot clinical trial. Participants completed 10 × 1 h sessions of robotic rehabilitation combined with motor cortex anodal tDCS. Feasibility, acceptability and practicality, were assessed including the number of participants completing the protocol, factors limiting participation, time required for sessions, and completion of functional assessments and tolerability scales. To assess safety, standardized clinical and robotic measures of sensorimotor function were performed. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04233710). Results: Eight children were recruited (mean age 8y ± 1.8y, range 6-11 years) and 5 completed the intervention. There were no serious adverse events. One child developed focal seizures 6 weeks after the trial that were deemed to be unrelated. Barriers to completion included time and scheduling demands and patient factors, specifically cognitive/behavioral impairments and dyskinesia. No decline in clinical function was appreciated. Conclusions: Robotic upper extremity rehabilitation combined with tDCS may be feasible in children with bilateral CP. Careful participant selection, family engagement, and protocol adaptations are recommended to better understand the feasibility and tolerability of future trials.

Indexed as

bilateral cerebral palsychildrenpediatricrobotic rehabilitationtranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36188922
PMCPMC9397997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.