Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36189936›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

Structural connectome quantifies tumour invasion and predicts survival in glioblastoma patients.

Yiran Wei, Chao Li, Zaixu Cui, Roxanne Claudeve Mayrand, Jingjing Zou, Adrianna Leanne Kok Chi Wong, Rohitashwa Sinha, Tomasz Matys, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Stephen John Price

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting glioblastoma progression using MR diffusion tensor imaging: A systematic review.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yiran WeiCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Chao LiCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Zaixu CuiChinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing 102206, China.
Roxanne Claudeve MayrandCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Jingjing ZouDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Adrianna Leanne Kok Chi WongCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Rohitashwa SinhaCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-4141
Tomasz MatysDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Carola-Bibiane SchönliebDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, The Centre for Mathematical Imaging in Healthcare, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.
Stephen John PriceCambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBChinese Institute for Brain Research · CNUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is characterized by diffuse infiltration into the surrounding tissue along white matter tracts. Identifying the invisible tumour invasion beyond focal lesion promises more effective treatment, which remains a significant challenge. It is increasingly accepted that glioblastoma could widely affect brain structure and function, and further lead to reorganization of neural connectivity. Quantifying neural connectivity in glioblastoma may provide a valuable tool for identifying tumour invasion. Here we propose an approach to systematically identify tumour invasion by quantifying the structural connectome in glioblastoma patients. We first recruit two independent prospective glioblastoma cohorts: the discovery cohort with 117 patients and validation cohort with 42 patients. Next, we use diffusion MRI of healthy subjects to construct tractography templates indicating white matter connection pathways between brain regions. Next, we construct fractional anisotropy skeletons from diffusion MRI using an improved voxel projection approach based on the tract-based spatial statistics, where the strengths of white matter connection and brain regions are estimated. To quantify the disrupted connectome, we calculate the deviation of the connectome strengths of patients from that of the age-matched healthy controls. We then categorize the disruption into regional disruptions on the basis of the relative location of connectome to focal lesions. We also characterize the topological properties of the patient connectome based on the graph theory. Finally, we investigate the clinical, cognitive and prognostic significance of connectome metrics using Pearson correlation test, mediation test and survival models. Our results show that the connectome disruptions in glioblastoma patients are widespread in the normal-appearing brain beyond focal lesions, associated with lower preoperative performance (P < 0.001), impaired cognitive function (P < 0.001) and worse survival (overall survival: hazard ratio = 1.46, P = 0.049; progression-free survival: hazard ratio = 1.49, P = 0.019). Additionally, these distant disruptions mediate the effect on topological alterations of the connectome (mediation effect: clustering coefficient -0.017, P < 0.001, characteristic path length 0.17, P = 0.008). Further, the preserved connectome in the normal-appearing brain demonstrates evidence of connectivity reorganization, where the increased neural connectivity is associated with better overall survival (log-rank P = 0.005). In conclusion, our connectome approach could reveal and quantify the glioblastoma invasion distant from the focal lesion and invisible on the conventional MRI. The structural disruptions in the normal-appearing brain were associated with the topological alteration of the brain and could indicate treatment target. Our approach promises to aid more accurate patient stratification and more precise treatment planning.

Indexed as

ConnectomeGlioblastomaWhite MatterBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansProspective Studiesbrain connectomebrain reorganizationglioblastomasurvival analysistumour invasion

Identifiers

PMID36189936
PMCPMC10115235
OpenAlexW4300690456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.