Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36190440›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychopharmacology

Pimavanserin Exposure-Response Analyses in Patients With Schizophrenia: Results From the Phase 2 ADVANCE Study.

Mona Darwish, Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, Julie Passarell, Joel Owen, David Jaworowicz, Daryl DeKarske, Srdjan Stankovic

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. An Open-Label Study Investigating the 5-HTClinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Clinically Oriented Review of New Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mona DarwishFrom the Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, NJ.
Dragana Bugarski-KirolaAcadia Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Julie PassarellCognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, NY.
Joel OwenCognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, NY.
David JaworowiczCognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, NY.
Daryl DeKarskeAcadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA.
Srdjan StankovicFrom the Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, NJ.
Simulations Plus (United States) · USAcadia Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

backgroundPimavanserin is a selective serotonin 5-HT 2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist being investigated in patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. This analysis aimed to characterize exposure-response relationships of pimavanserin in this population. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Exposure-response models were developed using data from ADVANCE. Patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia receiving background antipsychotics were randomized to pimavanserin 20 mg (adjusted to 34 or 10 mg between weeks 2-8 based on efficacy or tolerability) or placebo for 26 weeks. Time-varying pimavanserin exposure measures were predicted for each patient using a population pharmacokinetic model and individual empiric Bayesian parameter estimates. Response measures were the Negative Symptom Assessment 16 (NSA-16, primary end point), Personal and Social Performance scale, negative symptoms component of the Clinical Global Impression of Schizophrenia-Severity Scale, and adverse events. FINDINGS/

resultsA higher pimavanserin exposure was associated with greater improvement in NSA-16 score. For a median area under the pimavanserin plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours of 1465 ng × h/mL for the 34-mg dose, the model predicted a 10.5-point reduction in NSA-16 score. This exposure-response relationship with NSA-16 scores was not influenced by covariates. Similar results were observed with Personal and Social Performance and Clinical Global Impression of Schizophrenia-Severity, but not to the extent as NSA-16. There was no significant exposure-response relationship with anxiety, headache, insomnia, or somnolence. IMPLICATIONS/

conclusionsIncreasing pimavanserin plasma concentration was associated with improved NSA-16 scores (primary end point) in patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. No exposure-response relationship with select adverse events was observed.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaBayes TheoremHumansPiperidinesUreaAntipsychotic AgentspimavanserinPiperidinesUrea

Identifiers

PMID36190440
PMCPMC9640280
OpenAlexW4300687992

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.