Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201066›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2022

Intravascular ultrasound-based decision tree model for the optimal endovascular treatment strategy selection of femoropopliteal artery disease-results from the ONION Study.

Yuko Yazu, Masahiko Fujihara, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Naoya Kurata, Aya Nakata, Hitoshi Yoshimura, Tomoaki Ito, Masashi Fukunaga, Amane Kozuki, Yusuke Tomoi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review on the Use of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography During Femoropopliteal Endovascular Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yuko YazuDepartment of Medical Engineering, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.
Masahiko FujiharaDepartment of Cardiology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada-City Osaka, 4-27-1, Kamoricho, 596-8522, Japan. masahiko-fujihara@themis.ocn.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-9220
Mitsuyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoya KurataDepartment of Medical Engineering, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Aya NakataDepartment of Medical Engineering, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hitoshi YoshimuraDepartment of Medical Engineering, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoaki ItoDepartment of Medical Engineering, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masashi FukunagaCardiovascular Division, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Amane KozukiDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke TomoiDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kokura Memorial Hospital · JPMorinomiya Hospital · JPSaiseikai Nakatsu Hospital · JPKansai Rosai Hospital · JPKishiwada Tokushukai Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of catheter-based imaging in peripheral interventions for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) has increased with percutaneous interventions. To clarify the relation between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) information and procedure selection strategy for endovascular treatment therapy (EVT) of the femoropopliteal artery in the real-world clinical settings wherein new endovascular technologies (NETs), including drug-coated balloon (DCB), drug-eluting stent (DES), and covered stent-graft (CS). Our retrospective multicenter analysis examined symptomatic 970 patients treated by EVT for de novo femoropopliteal lesions with IVUS guidance. The decision tree analysis was performed retrospectively to determine the association of IVUS and angiography parameters with the strategy selection of endovascular procedures. We divided the study population according to the developed tree, and identified the most popular strategy selection in each subgroup. We finally examined whether the restenosis risk would be different among respective subgroups of the tree.

resultsDuring the study periods, plain old balloon angioplasty, DCB, and bare nitinol stent were most frequently selected (25.3%, 23.9%, and 23.8%, respectively). The drug-eluting stent (DES), covered stent (CS), and spot stent strategies were used in 7.3%, 11.5%, and 8.1%. NETs had the lowest restenosis risk in the overall population. The decision tree had a depth of six branches and divided the patients into 11 subgroups by IVUS and angiography parameters. The restenosis rate was similarly low among these 11 subgroups when the most popular NET in each subgroup was selected (P = 0.94).

conclusionsThe use of IVUS data along with angiography data would standardize the selection of endovascular procedures and can improve patency outcomes if NETs are used properly.

Indexed as

Covered stent-graftDrug-Eluting stentEndovascular TherapyFemoropopliteal segmentIntravascular Ultrasound、Drug-Coated stentPeripheral artery disease

Identifiers

PMID36201066
PMCPMC9537399
OpenAlexW4302307333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.