Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36203968›Full record

ArticleDNA2022

Nucleases and Co-Factors in DNA Replication Stress Responses.

Jac A Nickoloff, Neelam Sharma, Lynn Taylor, Sage J Allen, Robert Hromas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Dynamic Properties of the DNA Damage Response Mre11/Rad50 Complex.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jac A NickoloffDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Neelam SharmaDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lynn TaylorDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Sage J AllenDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Robert HromasDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Colorado State University · USMays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio

Funding

EEPD1 Repair of Stressed Replication ForksR01CA205224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robert A Hromas · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
METNASE ROLES IN NHEJ, DNA INTEGRATION AND TRANSLOCATIONR01GM084020 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICKOLOFF, JAC A · 2009 to 2016
$2.4M
EPIGENETIC CONTROL OF NHEJ DNA REPAIRR01CA139429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HROMAS, ROBERT A · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139429NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205224NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse during S phase. There are many sources of replication stress, such as DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents including commonly used cancer therapeutics, and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences comprising fragile sites, G-quadraplex DNA, hairpins at trinucleotide repeats, and telomeres. Replication stress is also a consequence of conflicts between opposing transcription and replication, and oncogenic stress which dysregulates replication origin firing and fork progression. Cells initially respond to replication stress by protecting blocked replisomes, but if the offending problem (e.g., DNA damage) is not bypassed or resolved in a timely manner, forks may be cleaved by nucleases, inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and providing a means to accurately restart stalled forks via homologous recombination. However, DSBs pose their own risks to genome stability if left unrepaired or misrepaired. Here we focus on replication stress response systems, comprising DDR signaling, fork protection, and fork processing by nucleases that promote fork repair and restart. Replication stress nucleases include MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, and FEN1. Replication stress factors are important in cancer etiology as suppressors of genome instability associated with oncogenic mutations, and as potential cancer therapy targets to enhance the efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapeutics.

Indexed as

DNA damageDNA damage responseDNA double-strand breaksgenome instabilityreplication stressstructure-specific nucleases

Identifiers

PMID36203968
PMCPMC9534323
OpenAlexW4214937268

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.