Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36205535›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2022

Interplay between substrate rigidity and tissue fluidity regulates cell monolayer spreading.

Michael F Staddon, Michael P Murrell, Shiladitya Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Mathematical Model for Chemo-Mechanically Induced Collective Cell Motility on Planar Elastic Substrates.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Substrate stress relaxation regulates monolayer fluidity and leader cell formation for collectively migrating epithelia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Physical Forces in Regeneration of Cells and Tissues.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Proliferation symmetry breaking in growing tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanical control of cell proliferation patterns in growing tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael F StaddonCenter for Systems Biology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael P MurrellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-2077
Shiladitya BanerjeeDepartment of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. shiladtb@andrew.cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-2556

Funding

Systems analysis of phenotypic switch in control of cancer invasionU54CA209992 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVCHENKO, ANDRE · 2016 to 2021
$10.1M
Universal Roles of Force Generation and Transmission in Biological SystemsR01GM126256 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, TAEYOON · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Biophysical models and mechanisms for cellular adaptation to environmental stressR35GM143042 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BANERJEE, SHILADITYA · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209992NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126256NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated and cooperative motion of cells is essential for embryonic development, tissue morphogenesis, wound healing and cancer invasion. A predictive understanding of the emergent mechanical behaviors in collective cell motion is challenging due to the complex interplay between cell-cell interactions, cell-matrix adhesions and active cell behaviors. To overcome this challenge, we develop a predictive cellular vertex model that can delineate the relative roles of substrate rigidity, tissue mechanics and active cell properties on the movement of cell collectives. We apply the model to the specific case of collective motion in cell aggregates as they spread into a two-dimensional cell monolayer adherent to a soft elastic matrix. Consistent with recent experiments, we find that substrate stiffness regulates the driving forces for the spreading of cellular monolayer, which can be pressure-driven or crawling-based depending on substrate rigidity. On soft substrates, cell monolayer spreading is driven by an active pressure due to the influx of cells coming from the aggregate, whereas on stiff substrates, cell spreading is driven primarily by active crawling forces. Our model predicts that cooperation of cell crawling and tissue pressure drives faster spreading, while the spreading rate is sensitive to the mechanical properties of the tissue. We find that solid tissues spread faster on stiff substrates, with spreading rate increasing with tissue tension. By contrast, the spreading of fluid tissues is independent of substrate stiffness and is slower than solid tissues. We compare our theoretical results with experimental results on traction force generation and spreading kinetics of cell monolayers, and provide new predictions on the role of tissue fluidity and substrate rigidity on collective cell motion.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCell MovementKinetics

Identifiers

PMID36205535
PMCPMC9700261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.