Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36206323›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Nuclear position modulates long-range chromatin interactions.

Elizabeth H Finn, Tom Misteli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth H FinnProgram in Cell Cycle and Cancer Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Tom MisteliNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3530-3020
National Institutes of Health · USOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

Nuclear Architecture and DiseaseZIABC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human genome is non-randomly organized within the cell nucleus. Spatial mapping of genome folding by biochemical methods and imaging has revealed extensive variation in locus interaction frequencies between cells in a population and between homologs within an individual cell. Commonly used mapping approaches typically examine either the relative position of genomic sites to each other or the position of individual loci relative to nuclear landmarks. Whether the frequency of specific chromatin-chromatin interactions is affected by where in the nuclear space a locus is located is unknown. Here, we have simultaneously mapped at the single cell level the interaction frequencies and radial position of more than a hundred locus pairs using high-throughput imaging to ask whether the location within the nucleus affects interaction frequency. We find strong enrichment of many interactions at specific radial positions. Position-dependency of interactions was cell-type specific, correlated with local chromatin type, and cell-type-specific enriched associations were marked by increased variability, sometimes without a significant decrease in mean spatial distance. These observations demonstrate that the folding of the chromatin fiber, which brings genomically distant loci into proximity, and the position of that chromatin fiber relative to nuclear landmarks, are closely linked.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromosomesCell NucleusGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID36206323
PMCPMC9581366
OpenAlexW4303449066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.