ArticleScientific reports2022
Extracellular DNA concentrations in various aetiologies of acute kidney injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Biomarkers and Targeted Drug Prediction for Acute Kidney Injury: A Computational ApproachEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Cytosolic nucleic acid sensing as driver of critical illness: mechanisms and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Hierarchical Targeting Nanodrug with Holistic DNA Protection for Effective Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Association between extracellular DNA levels, markers of inflammation and left ventricular mass index in children with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Systemic mechanisms of necrotic cell debris clearance.Cell death & disease · 2024Review
- Article
- Dynamics of Urinary Extracellular DNA in Urosepsis.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- NETs-Induced Thrombosis Impacts on Cardiovascular and Chronic Kidney Disease.Circulation research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular DNA (ecDNA) in plasma is a non-specific biomarker of tissue damage. Urinary ecDNA, especially of mitochondrial origin, is a potential non-invasive biomarker of kidney damage. Despite prominent tissue damage, ecDNA has not yet been comprehensively analysed in acute kidney injury (AKI). We analysed different fractions of ecDNA, i.e. total, nuclear and mitochondrial, in plasma and urine of children, and different animal models of AKI. We also analysed the activity of the deoxyribonuclease (DNase), which is contributes to the degradation of ecDNA. Patients with AKI had higher total and nuclear ecDNA in both, plasma and urine (sixfold and 12-fold in plasma, and 800-fold in urine, respectively), with no difference in mitochondrial ecDNA. This was mainly found for patients with AKI due to tubulointerstitial nephritis and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. Increased plasma ecDNA was also found in animal models of AKI, including adenine nephropathy (fivefold), haemolytic uremic syndrome (fourfold), and ischemia-reperfusion injury (1.5-fold). Total urinary ecDNA was higher in adenine nephropathy and ischemia-reperfusion injury (1300-fold and twofold, respectively). DNase activity in urine was significantly lower in all animal models of AKI in comparison to controls. In conclusion, plasma total and nuclear ecDNA and urinary total ecDNA is increased in patients and animals with particular entities of AKI, suggesting a mechanism-dependent release of ecDNA during AKI. Further studies should focus on the dynamics of ecDNA and its potential role in the pathogenesis of AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.