Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36210522›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2023

Disruption of plant plasma membrane by Nep1-like proteins in pathogen-plant interactions.

Katja Pirc, Isabell Albert, Thorsten Nürnberger, Gregor Anderluh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ThePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Aerolysin-like proteins fromFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determining Macromolecular Structures Using Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katja PircDepartment of Molecular Biology and Nanobiotechnology, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1839-2044
Isabell AlbertMolecular Plant Physiology, FAU Erlangen-Nüremberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-496X
Thorsten NürnbergerCenter of Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7804-7170
Gregor AnderluhDepartment of Molecular Biology and Nanobiotechnology, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9916-8465
National Institute of Chemistry · SIFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid membrane destruction by microbial pore-forming toxins (PFTs) is a ubiquitous mechanism of damage to animal cells, but is less prominent in plants. Nep1-like proteins (NLPs) secreted by phytopathogens that cause devastating crop diseases, such as potato late blight, represent the only family of microbial PFTs that effectively damage plant cells by disrupting the integrity of the plant plasma membrane. Recent research has elucidated the molecular mechanism of NLP-mediated membrane damage, which is unique among microbial PFTs and highly adapted to the plant membrane environment. In this review, we cover recent insight into how NLP cytolysins damage plant membranes and cause cell death.

Indexed as

PlantsProteinsAnimalsCell DeathCell MembraneProteinscrop protectionglycosylinositol phosphorylceramidesmembrane damageNep1-like proteinsplant plasma membranepore formationpore-forming proteins

Identifiers

PMID36210522
PMCPMC10100409
OpenAlexW4303983261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.