ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
New adverse coronary events in valve-in-valve TAVR and native TAVR-A 2-year matched cohort.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07751965 (Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm, Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Myval Transcatheter Heart Valve), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm, Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Myval Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) System in High-risk Patients With Severe Symptomatic Non- or Mildly Calcified Aortic Regurgitation.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and Factors Associated With In-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Obesity Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.Cardiology research · 2026Article
- Optimal antithrombotic strategy following valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Leaflet thrombosis in transcatheter aortic valve intervention: mechanisms, prevention, and treatment options.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the incidence of new adverse coronary events (NACE) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and valve-in-valve TAVR (ViV-TAVR). Background: ViV-TAVR is an accepted treatment for degenerative prostheses among patients with high surgical-risk. TAVR studies have suggested an increased risk of coronary artery obstruction and flow stasis causing thrombus formation. Whether contemporary ViV-TAVR is associated with higher rate of coronary events compared to TAVR is unknown. Methods: We used data from 1,224 TAVR patients between 2016 and 2021. We propensity-matched patients following ViV-TAVR and TAVR by significant predictors to overcome confounders in patients' baseline characteristics and procedural factors. Results: The matched population included 129 patients in each group. In line with prior reports, there was a higher in-hospital coronary artery obstruction rate with ViV-TAVR (3.1 vs. 1.6%; Conclusion: At 2-year follow-up, ViV-TAVR was not associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction, unplanned catheterization, coronary artery bypass grafting, or hypoattenuated leaflet thickening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.