ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic signature and tumor microenvironment infiltration characteristics of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs for patients with colon adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of long non-coding RNAs associated with disulfidptosis for prognostic signature and immunotherapy response in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Exosome-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Knockdown of LncRNA NIFK-AS1 inhibits the activation of CD4 + T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus by regulating the let-7f-5p/STAT3 axis.Immunologic research · 2026Article
- Review
- Cuproptosis in lung cancer: a nexus of ncRNA regulation, epigenetics, and tumor microenvironment Remodeling.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Epigenetic modification of cuproptosis by non-coding RNAs in cancer drug resistance.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Ferroptosis-related LncRNAs in diseases.BMC biology · 2025Review
- Subtype cluster analysis unveiled the correlation between m6A- and cuproptosis-related lncRNAs and the prognosis, immune microenvironment, and treatment sensitivity of esophageal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Gene Expression Regulation and the Signal Transduction of Programmed Cell Death.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Novel cuproptosis-related lncRNAs can predict the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Identification of anoikis-related subtypes and immune landscape in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A neutrophil extracellular traps-associated lncRNA signature predicts the clinical outcomes in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis, a newly described method of regulatory cell death (RCD), may be a viable new therapy option for cancers. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been confirmed to be correlated with epigenetic controllers and regulate histone protein modification or DNA methylation during gene transcription. The roles of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (CRLs) in Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), however, remain unknown. Methods: COAD transcriptome data was obtained from the TCGA database. Thirteen genes associated to cuproptosis were identified in published papers. Following that, correlation analysis was used to identify CRLs. The cuproptosis associated prognostic signature was built and evaluated using Lasso regression and COX regression analysis. A prognostic signature comprising six CRLs was established and the expression patterns of these CRLs were analyzed by qRT-PCR. To assess the clinical utility of prognostic signature, we performed tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis, mutation analysis, nomogram generation, and medication sensitivity analysis. Results: We identified 49 prognosis-related CRLs in COAD and constructed a prognostic signature consisting of six CRLs. Each patient can be calculated for a risk score and the calculation formula is: Risk score =TNFRSF10A-AS1 * (-0.2449) + AC006449.3 * 1.407 + AC093382.1 *1.812 + AC099850.3 * (-0.0899) + ZEB1-AS1 * 0.4332 + NIFK-AS1 * 0.3956. Six CRLs expressions were investigated by qRT-PCR in three colorectal cancer cell lines. In three cohorts, COAD patients were identified with different risk groups, with the high-risk group having a worse prognosis than the low-risk group. Furthermore, there were differences in immune cell infiltration and tumor mutation burden (TMB) between the two risk groups. We also identified certain drugs that were more sensitive to the high-risk group: Paclitaxel, Vinblastine, Sunitinib and Elescloml. Conclusions: Our findings may be used to further investigate RCD, comprehension of the prognosis and tumor microenvironment infiltration characteristics in COAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.