Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36215327›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

The Effect of an App-Based Home Exercise Program on Self-reported Pain Intensity in Unspecific and Degenerative Back Pain: Pragmatic Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hannes Weise, Benedikt Zenner, Bettina Schmiedchen, Leo Benning, Michael Bulitta, Daniel Schmitz, Kuno Weise

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannes WeiseInstitute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8443-740X
Benedikt ZennerInstitute of Health Care and Public Management, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-9970
Bettina SchmiedchenVivira Health Lab, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-3898
Leo BenningVivira Health Lab, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-9702
Michael BulittaCRM Biometrics, Rheinbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1928-3886
Daniel SchmitzCRM Biometrics, Rheinbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-328X
Kuno WeiseInstitute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-2285
University of Tübingen · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recommended first-line treatment for unspecific and degenerative back pain consists of movement exercises and patient education.

objectiveUsing a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the effectiveness of a digital home exercise program on self-reported pain intensity compared with the standard of care for physiotherapy.

methodsParticipant recruitment was based on newspaper advertisements and a consecutive on-site assessment for eligibility and enrollment. Participants with unspecific and degenerative back pain aged ≥18 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 12-week stand-alone digital home exercise program or physiotherapy. The digital home exercise program included 4 exercises daily, while physiotherapy included 6 to 12 sessions, depending on the severity of symptoms. The primary outcome was pain, which was assessed using a verbal numerical rating scale. The clinical relevance of pain reduction was assessed using the following thresholds: improvement of at least 1.4 points on the verbal numerical rating scale and a pain reduction of at least 30%.

resultsDuring the study period, 108 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 105 participants to the control group. The mean difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at 12 weeks was -2.44 (95% CI -2.92 to -1.95; P<.01) in favor of the intervention group. The group receiving the digital therapeutic achieved a clinically relevant reduction in pain over the course of the study (baseline vs 12 weeks), with a mean change of -3.35 (SD 2.05) score points or -53.1% (SD 29.5). By contrast, this change did not reach clinical relevance in the control group (mean -0.91, SD 1.5; -14.6%, SD 25.3). Retention rates of 89.9% in the intervention group and 97.3% in the control group were maintained throughout the study.

conclusionsThe use of the app-based home exercise program led to a significant and clinically relevant reduction in pain intensity throughout the 12-week duration of the program. The intervention studied showed superior improvement in self-reported pain intensity when compared with the standard of care. Given the great demand for standard physiotherapy for unspecific and degenerative back pain, digital therapeutics are evolving into a suitable therapeutic option that can overcome the limitations of access and availability of conventional modes of health care delivery into this spectrum of indications. However, further independent evaluations are required to support the growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of digital therapeutics in real-world care settings.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00022781; https://tinyurl.com/hpdraa89.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentAdultBack PainExercise TherapyHumansPain MeasurementSelf Reportback paindigital healthdigital therapeuticexercise therapymHealthmobile healthmobile phonemusculoskeletal healthprimary care

Identifiers

PMID36215327
PMCPMC9652727
OpenAlexW4304481095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.