Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36216370›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

A qualitative interview study of GPs' experiences of prescribing opioid medication for chronic pain.

Simon Gill, John Bailey, Sadia Nafees, Rob Poole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon GillWrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-1467
John BaileyCentre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom j.bailey@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-605X
Sadia NafeesCentre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1553-3013
Rob PooleCentre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-3981
Bangor University · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing of opioid medication has increased over the past 20 years. Most occurs in primary care for chronic pain. There is little evidence that these drugs are effective for this indication. There are concerns about the continuing prescribing of opioids, particularly in the long term and at high doses.

aimTo explore GPs' experiences of prescribing opioids, problems encountered, and factors militating against good prescribing practice. DESIGN &

settingQualitative interviews with GPs who prescribe opioids in primary care in North East Wales.

methodSemi-structured interviews with 20 GPs were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis utilising the framework approach.

resultsParticipating GPs identified a range of problems associated with prescribed opioids. They were concerned about limited effectiveness of the drugs and what they perceived as addiction resulting from their use. They identified healthcare system factors that were obstacles to good prescribing practice such as lack of continuity of care, poor access to secondary care pain management support, and, most importantly, constant time pressure. They reported adverse effects on relationships with patients. Unrealistic expectations that pain could be eliminated resulted in pressure to prescribe stronger drugs and increased doses. It led to difficulties in establishing and maintaining trust and in persuading patients to agree to, and to carry out, dose reductions.

conclusionThemes emerging from this study suggest that GPs lack appropriate control of opioid prescribing. There is a need to develop methods to help patients and GPs to work together to manage chronic pain safely.

Indexed as

analgesics, opioidchronic paindrug prescriptionsgeneral practiceprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID36216370
PMCPMC9904793
OpenAlexW4303984470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.