Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224402›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2022

Antibody response to a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adults with haematological and solid cancer: a systematic review.

Youssra Al Hajji, Harriet Taylor, Thomas Starkey, Lennard Y W Lee, Michael Tilby

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Youssra Al Hajji *School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Harriet Taylor *School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Thomas StarkeyInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-9563
Lennard Y W LeeInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Michael TilbyDepartment of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK. Michael.tilby@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1663-4860
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients living with cancer are at a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This systematic review aims to investigate the current available evidence about the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines in patients living with cancer.

methodsA systematic search was undertaken for studies published until March 1, 2022. A systematic narrative review was undertaken to include all studies that evaluated the efficacy of booster vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer.

resultsFifteen studies encompassing 1205 patients with cancer were included. We found that a booster vaccine dose induced a higher response in patients with solid cancer as compared to haematological malignancies. Recent systemic anticancer therapy does not appear to affect seroconversion in solid organ malignancies, however, there is an association between B-cell depleting therapies and poor seroconversion in haematological patients.

conclusionsThird booster vaccination induces an improved antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in adults with haematological and solid cancer, relative to patients who only receive two doses. Access to vaccination boosters should be made available to patients at risk of poor immunological responses, and the provision of fourth doses may be of benefit to this vulnerable population. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number CRD42021270420.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesNeoplasmsAdultAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationHumansImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2VaccinationViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36224402
PMCPMC9555704
OpenAlexW4304734201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.