Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225202›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Effectiveness of

Jinlong Zhao, Xiao Xiao, Guanghui Zhou, Nanjun Xu, Jun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinlong ZhaoThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao XiaoThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guanghui ZhouThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Nanjun XuThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jun LiuThe Research Team on Bone and Joint Degeneration and Injury of Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM) and Wanfang databases for published SRs and MAs on YSHZT for the treatment of PMOP. The retrieval time was limited to July 2022. The Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)-2 tool and Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) classification system were used to evaluate the methodological quality and the evidence quality of the SRs and MAs, respectively. Results: A total of 14 SRs and MAs involving 14720 cases of PMOP were included. The results of the methodological quality evaluation indicated that there were no studies with medium- or high-quality methodology included in the study and that there were 9 and 5 low- and very low-quality studies, respectively. The GRADE evaluation results show that while there was no high-level evidence based on 86 evaluation indicators, there was 1 study with moderate-level evidence (1%), 44 studies with low-level evidence (51%) and 41 with very low-level evidence (48%) based on other indicators. YSHZT can significantly improve the bone mineral density (BMD) of Ward's triangle, with a mean difference range of 0.03 to 0.12. Different conclusions were reported regarding the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral trochanter, femoral neck, and hip, as well as bone turnover markers, adverse reactions and other outcome indicators in different SRs and thus still need further study. Conclusions: The methodological quality and the evidence quality of the outcome indicators for YSHZT in the treatment of PMOP are poor, and the efficacy and safety of YSHZT in the treatment of PMOP still need to be further verified by more high-quality studies.

Indexed as

Osteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityFemaleHumansPublicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicChinese medicineChinese traditional medicinepostmenopausal osteoporosissystematic reviewYushen Hezhi therapy

Identifiers

PMID36225202
PMCPMC9548895
OpenAlexW4297229184

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.