ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Does filter pore size introduce bias in DNA sequence-based plankton community studies?
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The community patterns and assembly mechanism varied in eukaryotic microorganisms with different cell sizes.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cell size of microbial eukaryotic plankton normally ranges from 0.2 to 200 μm. During the past decade, high-throughput sequencing of DNA has been revolutionizing their study on an unprecedented scale. Nonetheless, it is currently unclear whether we can accurately, effectively, and quantitatively depict the microbial eukaryotic plankton community using size-fractionated filtration combined with environmental DNA (eDNA) molecular methods. Here we assessed the microbial eukaryotic plankton communities with two filtering strategies from two subtropical reservoirs, that is one-step filtration (0.2-200 μm) and size-fractionated filtration (0.2-3 and 3-200 μm). The difference of 18S rRNA gene copy abundance between the two filtering treatments was less than 50% of the 0.2-200 μm microbial eukaryotic community for 95% of the total samples. Although the microbial eukaryotic plankton communities within the 0.2-200 μm and the 0.2-3 and 3-200 μm size fractions had approximately identical 18S rRNA gene copies, there were significant differences in their community composition. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the systemic bias introduced by size-fractionation filtration has more influence on unique OTUs than shared OTUs, and the significant differences in abundance between the two eukaryotic plankton communities largely occurred in low-abundance OTUs in specific seasons. This work provides new insights into the use of size-fractionation in molecular studies of microbial eukaryotes populating the plankton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.